Chapter I  ·  Epidemic

The Last Major Medieval-Type Epidemic: Cholera in Transylvania, 1872–1873

Elena Crinela Holom

Babeș-Bolyai University, Centre for Population Studies, Cluj-Napoca

I

Contents

  1. The Spread of the Epidemic
  2. Official Regulations and Medical Responses
  3. Social Customs, Superstitions & Resistance
  4. Demographic Impact
  5. References
1,146,239Inhabitants affected
46,303Fell ill
18,583Deaths
40.1%Case fatality rate

In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the world was affected by seven cholera pandemics, which unfolded between 1817 and 1970. Cholera had a strong impact on nineteenth-century Europe, resulting in significant demographic consequences and profoundly influencing people's perceptions and sensibilities. The disease manifested through severe and debilitating symptoms, claiming a high number of lives within an extremely short period of time. In some cases, less than 12 hours could pass between infection and death, leaving victims with little or no time to come to terms with their fate.

The case fatality rate — an indicator measuring the proportion of individuals who die from a particular disease out of the total number of diagnosed cases within a given period — ranged between 25% and 50% during the cholera epidemics in nineteenth-century Europe.

Between 1863 and 1874, the world was devastated by the fourth cholera pandemic. The Kingdom of Hungary, of which Transylvania was a part until its union with the Kingdom of Romania in 1918, was affected by two cholera epidemics, in 1866 and 1872–1873. The first devastated Transylvania between 18 July and 28 December 1866, affecting approximately 269,975 inhabitants. Of these, 5,311 fell ill, 3,470 recovered, and 1,841 died, resulting in a case fatality rate of 34.6%.

The cholera epidemic of 1872–1873 in Transylvania was far more devastating, affecting 1,146,239 inhabitants, of whom 46,303 fell ill. Among these, 27,686 recovered, 18,583 died from the disease, and 34 remained ill at the time of reporting. This resulted in a case fatality rate of 40.1%.

Figure 1

Case fatality rates across administrative units in Transylvania during the 1872–1873 cholera epidemic

Case fatality rates across administrative units in Transylvania
Source: Magyar Statisztikai Évkönyv 1874: 90–95.

The Spread of the Epidemic

In Transylvania, the first signs of cholera were reported as early as the end of 1872. However, the rapid spread of the disease became more evident starting in June 1873, affecting both urban and rural areas alike. Transylvanian periodicals began reporting the first victims as early as June, with the city of Kolozsvár/Cluj being particularly affected. The newspaper Magyar Polgár published a report on the state of the cholera epidemic in Cluj between 18 June and 18 July 1873, indicating 476 cases and 221 deaths. By the end of the epidemic, a total of 1,142 cases had been recorded in Cluj, of which 547 were fatal.

Cholera-related deaths in the city of Cluj were also recorded in parish registers, with entire pages recording this diagnosis.

Figure 2

Report on the state of the cholera epidemic in the Free Royal City of Cluj, between 18 June and 18 July 1873

Report on cholera epidemic in Cluj, 1873
Source: Magyar Polgár 1873 7(165): 73.
Figure 3

Excerpt from the parish death register of the Greek Catholic community in the city of Cluj

Excerpt from parish death register, Greek Catholic community, Cluj
Source: Arhivele Naționale Direcția Județeană Cluj, Colecția matricole parohiale de stare civilă.

The newspaper Telegraful român reported on the spread of the epidemic during the months of July and August, with cholera affecting an increasing number of areas in both the southern and northern parts of Transylvania. A report on the situation in August noted that "cholera is reaching ever greater proportions…, filling the entire population here with fear and anxiety."

Official Regulations and Medical Responses

In order to suppress the epidemic, prevent its spread, and limit panic among the population, a series of regulations and decrees were issued at the state level. These measures described in detail the symptoms of cholera: loss of appetite, constipation alternating with diarrhoea, abdominal pressure, belching, and loud intestinal noises, all accompanied by restlessness, insomnia, and marked exhaustion.

As a mode of transmission, cholera was believed to spread through the air, entering the body through respiration or through the consumption of contaminated food and water. Therefore, the main concern was the cleaning and purification of the air, the ventilation of dwellings, and their disinfection with ferrous sulphate, zinc vitriol, carbolic acid, and sulphuric acid.

People were advised to protect themselves by adopting a strict regimen of moderation in food, drink, and work. The conditions for maintaining good health also included calmness, courage, and cheerfulness, while fear, anxiety, and distrust were considered highly detrimental.

Social Customs, Superstitions & Resistance

Despite official measures, the persistence of older mentalities and attitudes related to illness and death remained strong within Transylvanian society. With regard to cholera, people continued to rely on various amulets, exorcisms, and rituals, such as the "cholera shirt." This ritual involved women producing a shirt that was spun, woven, and sewn within a single day. Two or three men carried it along the main road, accompanied by all the villagers — all passing through it, believing this would protect them from the disease.

The Transylvanian Székelys believed that water blessed in the Roman Catholic Church had disinfectant properties and should be poured into wells on the first Friday of the month, before sunrise.

Although emphasis was placed on the collaborative relationship between the population and physicians during the cholera epidemic, in many areas of Hungary and Transylvania, people in rural communities and small towns showed deep mistrust of public health measures and the medical personnel sent by the authorities. This aspect is also reflected in the caricature presented below, which vividly illustrates the reluctance to seek medical assistance. The dialogue between the two characters was as follows: "– Uncle János, you should go and fetch the doctor; you can see your wife is ill. – I'll go—I'm just waiting for her to get a little worse."

Figure 4

A caricature from the contemporary press suggested that people who frequented cafés did not fall ill with cholera, probably because death was thought to fear cigar smoke and did not dare enter

Kolera-Képek I: café-goers and cholera caricature
Source: Bolond Miska 1873 (14): 140.
Figure 5

A caricature from the contemporary press, suggesting negligence or a lack of response in the face of cholera

Kolera-Képek II: negligence in the face of cholera caricature
Source: Bolond Miska 1873 (14): 140.

Demographic Impact

A recent investigation based on data extracted from the Historical Population Database of Transylvania (HPDT) has provided further insights into how the population was affected by cholera. A higher proportion of cholera-related deaths was observed among adults compared to children. Substantial proportions of deaths occurred among children aged 1–4 years (41.2%) and 5–9 years (29.4%). Among adults, the highest mortality rate was recorded in the 25–34 age group — the most active segment of the population.

With regard to spatial distribution, a clear concentration of deaths was noted in settlements located along the Mureș River and its tributaries: 87.3% of child deaths and 81.2% of adult deaths occurred in these areas. The Mureș River, the longest river in Transylvania, functioned as a veritable vector in the spread of cholera, facilitating population mobility and the movement of goods along its course.

Figure 6

Deaths caused by cholera in Transylvania, by different category

Deaths caused by cholera in Transylvania by different category
Source: Holom & Hărăguș 2026: 96.

Although technological advances and the expansion of transport networks stimulated trade and communication, they also contributed to accelerating the spread of infectious disease — a paradox of interconnectedness.

A higher incidence of deaths was also recorded among Greek Catholic and Orthodox populations, who faced difficulties in access to medical services and educational resources. Among individuals with a recorded occupation, agriculturists accounted for the highest share of deaths (20.7%), with seasonal migrations during summer playing a crucial role in the spread of the disease.

Despite the many negative consequences of the disease, its management was accompanied by improvements in hygiene and the healthcare system. After the epidemic of 1872/1873, cholera was reported only sporadically in isolated cases. The adoption of the Sanitary Law of 1876 contributed to a more stable demographic regime in Transylvania, less affected by severe and widespread crises, and to an increase in life expectancy.

References

Arhivele Naționale Direcția Județeană Cluj, Colecția matricole parohiale de stare civilă.

Bolond Miska 1873 (14): 140.

Gazeta Transilvaniei 1873 36(58): 2.

Holom, E.C & Hărăguș, M. (2026) "The social, economic, and environmental unequal impact of cholera on deaths: an analysis of the 1872–1873 epidemic in Transylvania". The History of the Family 31(1): 81–110.

Magyar Polgár 1873 7(165): 71–74.

Magyar Statisztikai Évkönyv (1874). Volume 2. Budapest: Az Országos Magyar Kir. Statistikai Hivatal.

Magyarországi Rendeletek Tára. 1874 Hivatalos Kiadás. (1875). Budapest: Kiadja S Nyomja Wodianer F.